Two open PhD positions in project on biocultural diversity

By Jan Hanspach

We are currently looking for two PhD students in an interdisciplinary research project called “Biocultural diversity in farming landscapes of the Global South”. The project is funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within their Research for Sustainable Development program. The project will study the connection between biocultural diversity and sustainability through (I) a literature review, (II) empirical fieldwork in Bolivia and (III) workshops in a range of different farming landscapes in the Global South. The PhD students will be based in Lüneburg, but will spend a considerable part of their time doing field work in Bolivia. Therefore we would prefer to hire native speakers, but the call is open to others as well.

Bolivia is a country with a high biocultural diversity, i.e. a large diversity of ecological and cultural conditions that have co-evolved during a long history of interactions. This project will study the characteristics of this biocultural diversity and how it can contribute sustainability.

Here are the job adverts:

PhD1: Social aspects of biocultural diversity and sustainability

PhD 2: Ecological aspects of biocultural diversity and sustainability

The application deadline is August 13.

The advertisements have been officially published here.

Open postdoc position in new project on biocultural diversity

By Jan Hanspach

I am looking for a postdoc in a new interdisciplinary research project called “Biocultural diversity in farming landscapes of the Global South”. The project is funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within their Research for Sustainable Development program. The project will study the connection between biocultural diversity and sustainable development through (I) a literature review, (II) empirical fieldwork in Bolivia and (III) workshops in a range of different farming landscapes in the Global South. The postdoc would mainly be responsible for field work in Bolivia, which will be realized together with two PhD students.

Below is a a copy of the job advertisement. The original can be found on the Leuphana website here. Please note that the application deadline is March 13 – so only three weeks from now.

Bolivia is a country with a high biocultural diversity, i.e. a large diversity of ecological and cultural conditions that have co-evolved during a long history of interactions. This project will study the characteristics of this biocultural diversity and how it can contribute a sustainable development.

And here is the full advert:

Leuphana University of Lüneburg stands for innovation in education and scholarship based on the values of a humanistic, sustainable and entrepreneurial university. The collaborative search for knowledge and viable solutions in the areas of education, culture, sustainability as well as management and entrepreneurship defines the university model with its award-winning College, Graduate School and Professional School. Methodological diversity and interdisciplinary cooperation characterize our academic understanding.

Leuphana University of Lüneburg (foundation under public law), Faculty of Sustainability, has a vacancy for a full-time (100 %)
Research Associate (m/f/d)
salary group EG 13 TV-L

starting 1 June 2019 for a fixed term of 5 years.

The position is part of a new interdisciplinary research project funded by German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) entitled “Biocultural diversity in farming landscapes of the Global South”. The project will systematically assess how biocultural diversity is linked with indicators of sustainability and how fostering biocultural diversity can contribute to a sustainable development. A key component of the project will be empirical research in a case study area in Bolivia. This will be realized through ecological and social science field work on values, knowledge and practices as well as the corresponding formal and informal institutional settings.

Your tasks:
• Coordinate and conduct field work in the case study area;
• Conduct a governance and actor analysis around biocultural diversity in the Bolivia case study
• Identify development priorities in the Bolivia case study;
• Conduct a study on informal institutions and the role of gender in the maintenance of biocultural diversity in the Bolivia case study;
• Support PhD students and supervise master and bachelor students;
• Engage with local communities and experts in the case study area;
• Organize and conduct interviews and workshops in close collaboration with local NGOs and universities in Bolivia.

Your profile:
• Completed academic university degree (Master or equivalent) in environmental science, the social sciences or another relevant field;
• PhD or equivalent doctoral degree in a topic relevant to the project (e.g. biocultural diversity, governance, actor analysis);
• Strong qualitative analysis skills;
• Ability and enthusiasm to work in an intercultural and interdisciplinary group;
• Experience with field work in Latin America;
• Willingness to spend extended periods of time for field work in Bolivia;
• Excellent communication skills in Spanish (native speakers preferred);
• Strong communication and writing skills in English; and
• Strong research track record.

We offer:
• Flexible and family-friendly working hours
• Internal and external CPD courses
• University sports and health promotion measures for employees
• Employer-funded pension

Leuphana University of Lüneburg is an equal opportunity employer committed to fostering heterogeneity among its staff. Disabled applicants with equal qualifications will be given priority consideration. We are looking forward to receiving your application.

Your application:
Please address all selection criteria under clearly labeled headings in up to one short paragraph each. Please also send a CV (including publications), copies of relevant certificates and transcripts, and the names of up to three academic referees. For questions, please contact Dr. Jan Hanspach (hanspach@leuphana.de).

Please send your application by March 13, 2019 preferably electronically (as a single merged pdf file) or by mail to:

Leuphana University of Lüneburg
Personalservice, Corinna Schmidt
Subject: Postdoc-BioKultDiv
Universitätsallee 1
21335 Lüneburg
Germany
bewerbung@leuphana.de

Scenarios for southwestern Ethiopia

By Jan Hanspach

In the previous posts, Joern reported about our outreach tour that we went on in southwestern Ethiopia. An important aspect of that was the presentation of the scenarios that we had developed together with stakeholders from the area. While the details can be taken from our scenario book, I’d like to share a short summary and the scenario illustrations in this post.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

The scenario development was largely based on more than 30 stakeholder workshops in 2015 and 2016, through which we collected information on major social-ecological changes in the past, the present, and the future, the main drivers and main uncertainties and their relationships. From that we collated a causal-loop diagram, which describes the main dynamics of the system.

Based on that systems understanding we developed a scenario logic and draft scenario narratives, which we validated and discussed through six more workshops in 2018. Based on these, we finalized the scenario narratives, and with the help of some ink and watercolors I have put together some illustrations that should give a glimpse of what the future could look like under the different scenario conditions in a “typical” village in the area.

Additionally, I have drawn landscape cross-sections, so that one doesn’t only see how the village and the farmland might change, but also the forest.

Landscape cross-sections for the different scenarios

Based on these visualisations we designed posters, which we handed out to the key stakeholders in the region. Also, we printed 10,000 postcards with the scenarios and distributed them widely in the villages. Posters and postcards can be seen and downloaded here.

 

 

postcard piles

Piles of postcards – later to be distributed among local people.

We hope that distributing all the outreach material will foster discussions and help people to think about how current decisions and dynamics can shape the future of southwestern Ethiopia.

NEW PAPER: From synergies to trade-offs in food security and biodiversity conservation

BY JAN HANSPACH

Some time ago, we had invited to participate in a survey on food security and biodiversity conservation on this blog. After some months of data analysis, write-up, rejections and revisions, we now we can announce that the main findings from this survey have been finally published. The paper went online just a few days ago on the journal website and will be published the November issue of Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 

And here are the key findings shortly summarized:

(1) When comparing between landscapes we did not find a clear trade-off between food security and biodiversity.

(2) Synergies in food security and biodiversity were related to situations with equitable land access and high social and human capital. Food security was also high when market access was good and financial capital high, but that was linked to poor biodiversity outcomes.

(3) For the future, most experts expected improvements in food security, but losses of biodiversity in their landscapes.

We received responses for landscapes from a wide range of countries. The map shows the origin of the 110 cases that we used for analysis.

 

You also can directly download a pdf of the full paper and a pdf of the merged appendices here. Enjoy reading!

Finally, a big thanks to all experts that contributed to the survey!

Making oceans plastic free – reducing plastic bag use in Indonesia

BY JAN HANSPACH

Plastic is one of the blessing of our time – it’s cheap, it’s versatile and it’s made to last. Unfortunately, its durability is turning it more and more into a curse. Per year more then 300 million tones of new plastic are produced and only a tiny part is being recycled or properly disposed of. Plastic nowadays can virtually be found everywhere in the world from the arctic to the deep sea. Especially in the oceans, plastic is accumulating (80% coming from terrestrial sources) with unforeseeable effects on marine species and ecosystems.

https://makingoceansplasticfree.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/MOPF_wastepiechart_EN.jpg

Made to last – plastic garbage is everywhere and quite often it ends up in the ocean. The numbers are estimated percentages of waste items collected Bali’s biggest beach clean-up in history where more than 12.000 volunteers collected 40 tons of waste. (Credit: Making Oceans Plastic Free).

Well, this is known to most of us, but doing something about it often is tedious and takes energy and courage. A good friend of mine, Paritosha Kobbe, together with some other people, now has started an initiative with the ambitious vision of “Making oceans plastic free” and the more tangible goal of reducing plastic bag usage in Indonesia. Indonesia is the second largest producer of marine plastic garbage (China is on the infamous first place here) and plastic bags constitute a large share of it (see the waste pie chart above). Pari and his friends designed a reusable bag made from recycled plastic and today they started their crowdfunding campaign to bring this into production, raise environmental awareness and to make people in Indonesia to use fewer plastic bags. Here is a short video describing their project:

If you like, you can support the initiative through crowd-funding:

https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/tasini-the-key-to-break-the-plastic-bag-habit

More information on the project (including press material, contacts and nice pictures) can be found here:

https://makingoceansplasticfree.com/press-kit/

Good luck with this… and maybe soon the idea will be exported to China as well!

New concept in sustainability science: Reverse transdisciplinarity

BY JAN HANSPACH

(Health Warning: this is to be read with your sense of humour switched on.) As you can see from Aisa’s very nice last post on this blog, we are currently in the second year of field work for our project on food security and biodiversity conservation in southwestern Ethiopia. So far, we have done hundreds of interviews, dozens of focus group discussions and workshops on a wide range of topics through which we involve stakeholders in the research process. This involvement of stakeholders in sustainability science is usually referred to as transdisciplinarity and it is meant to enrich the research process, to co-create knowledge, to increase relevance and finally to facilitate joint problem solving.

As opposed to this concept, this blog post introduces the concept of reverse transdisciplinarity, which is completely new to sustainability science. Reverse transdisciplinarity means the active involvement of researchers in real world processes, as for example in farming activities (see Fig. 1). This involvement truly empowers local stakeholders and I am pretty confident that it promises to become a key method in sustainability science in the very near future.

I am looking forward for many examples of how to implement it posted in the comments section below.

Fig. 1: Girma, one of our PhD students, demonstrates the concept of reverse transdisciplinarity in SW Ethiopia. While just a few minutes earlier he was trying to find interviewees for a survey, he spontaneously switched his role and started to actively improve food security in our study region. His ploughing saved important calories for local farmers and also helped to build trust among the local people. (Unfortunately, it didn’t help to find participants for the survey and we had to go somewhere else afterwards. Maybe it was because he didn’t plow in a straight line.)

Sustainability, urban ecology and landscape ecology

By Joern Fischer

I’m currently attending the 4th International Forum on Landscape Sustainability Science, held in Beijing and co-organised by Jingle Wu. For many years, Jingle has been an influential figure shaping landscape ecology. In 2013, he published an ambitious paper laying out an agenda for “landscape sustainability science”. Given his background, influence to date, and vision for the future, I was particularly excited to see Jingle talk.

Jingle chose to talk about the confluence of urban ecology and landscape ecology under the theme of sustainability. The reason for looking at this, he argued, was quite simple: humanity has become an increasingly urban species, so cities must not be ignored. Starting in about 2010, both in China and around the world, the proportion of people living in cities first overtook that living in rural areas – indeed, for better or worse, most humans now live in cities, not in rural areas. Cities, Jingle argued, have many problems associated with them (such as slums, crime, poverty, and pollution), but they are also centres of creativity and social and cultural development.

Over the last two decades, urbanisation has sparked a lot of interest among ecologists, largely because cities – unless carefully managed – can cause a large amount of ecological damage. Arguably, urban ecology has now evolved into a coherent discipline. With that, Jingle gave a review of key books on the topic of urban ecology – praising, in particular, Richard Forman’s book “Urban Ecology” from 2014. This book, incidentally, has now been translated into Chinese, driven by Richard’s belief that making China’s cities sustainable was a key challenge of our times.

Jingle then tracked the history of urban sustainability (published in his 2014 paper in Landscape and Urban Planning). It started off in the USA in the 1920s, primarily as a sociological approach. Shortly after that, in the 1940s, the “Berlin school” of ecology in cities emerged – this, by contrast was largely focused on ecology. And third, a systems approach emerged in 1960s, and this was starting to bridge ecological and social issues. The field then developed quite rapidly, with a landscape approach being applied to cities from the late 1980s onwards. (To get a proper summary of all this, read Jingle’s paper!)

With landscape ecology entering into urban ecology, from the 1990s onwards, issues of patterns and spatial heterogeneity became increasingly important, and more recently, the concept of ecosystem services has been an important addition to the field. Today, according to Jingle, there are three types of urban ecology: the ecology “in” cities (which species live in cities?), the ecology “of” cities (including ecosystem processes and services), and third, the “sustainability” of cities (with a stronger focus on human well-being, also drawing on the social sciences).

Given this history, where do we go? In Jingle’s view, cities should be viewed as human-environment systems, and at the same time as spatially structured landscapes, which are under constant human impact – with subsequent consequences for biodiversity, ecological processes and ecosystem services. Thus, it is possible to think about different patterns of cities, different impacts of cities, and different sustainability outcomes of cities. Patterns and impacts are studied intensively, and are increasingly well understood. Urban sustainability, by contrast, is less obvious … Jingle asked: “How do we generate actionable knowledge regarding urban sustainability?”

Relating human well-being directly to urban design, and to urban patterns, is something that Jingle implied to be a key research frontier. At the same time, Jingle argued there was a need to move beyond aesthetics and efficiency, and more carefully consider ecological processes.

“All cities are landscapes” and “all landscapes are heterogeneous”, Jingle told us – but also, landscapes are not just biophysical entities but are equally about people. Sustainability thus should play an increasingly important role in modern landscape ecology. When it comes to urban areas, Jingle emphasized that they cannot be separated from rural areas. A key challenge, therefore, will be to study the interrelationship between cities and rural areas.

Jingle left us with the slogan: Think globally, plan regionally, act locally.

Overall, I found Jingle’s talk to be an authoritative overview of key developments in urban ecology, landscape ecology and sustainability science. Thanks Jingle, for an inspiring talk!

NEW PAPER: Functional diversity of butterfly and bird communities in Southern Transylvania

BY JAN HANSPACH

Just a few days ago the December issue of Ecosystem Health and Sustainability went online. Two things are interesting in that issue. First, a new paper from our Romania project has been published there, and second, the cover features one of the villages in our study area.

Cover of the December issue of the journal. I took the picture when we were doing bear sign surveys in 2012 and shows the village of Biertan.

Cover of the December issue of the journal. I took the picture when we were doing bear sign surveys in 2012. It shows the village of Biertan. The fortified church of Biertan is listed as a UNESCO World Heritage site.

In the paper we studied how trait composition of butterfly and bird communities relates to environmental variables in order to get a more mechanistic understanding of what drives biodiversity in this farming landscape. This is particularly interesting because currently this landscape is subject to land use changes – agricultural intensification in some places and abandonment of pastures and arable fields in other areas which will have substantial biodiversity effects. We found in our study that functional diversity strongly correlated with taxonomic diversity and that land use type was the strongest driver of butterfly trait composition (especially correlating with life history strategies) and that amounts of woody vegetation were most strongly linked to bird traits (especially nesting and foraging strategies). Importantly, both land abandonment and intensification would therefore directly influence bird and butterfly communities via their functional traits. Maintaining a small-scale mosaic of different land cover types and gradients of woody vegetation throughout the landscape would be desirable to maintain a high functional diversity in the region in the future.

This paper is part of a special feature on “Ecosystem Management in Transition in Central and Eastern Europe” in which we have already published another paper (see our recent blog post here).

NEW PAPER: Participatory scenario planning in place-based social-ecological research: insights and experiences from 23 case studies

BY JAN HANSPACH

It is more than a year ago that we had announced the publication of the results of our scenario planning in Southern Transylvania on this blog. By the time, it was the first article that went online for a special issue featuring the Programme on Ecosystem Change and Society (PECS) in the journal Ecology and Society. Last week and still in the very same special issue, another paper went online to which we have contributed with our work in Transylvania. This new paper was led by Elisa Oteros-Rozas  and summarizes the methods and experiences from 23 different participatory scenario planning exercises from different parts of the world (see map).

 

Map of the location of the 23 scenario planning case studies. Underlying are the world's biomes after Olson et al. (2001, Bioscience 51: 933-938)

Map of the location of the 23 scenario planning case studies. Underlying are the world’s biomes after Olson et al. (2001, Bioscience 51: 933-938)

In short, the paper gives an overview of how diverse participatory scenario planning can be. This includes the different objectives, methods, outcomes and experiences that are associated to this social-ecological approach. Overall, participatory scenario planning was experienced as a very valuable and flexible tool to engage with stakeholders, foster mutual learning and to raise awareness for upcoming challenges. One of the downsides of many of the cases is probably that there are usually no resources available to monitor and evaluate the long term impacts that scenario planning excersises have.

 

 

Examples of outreach material from four of the scenario planning case studies.

Examples of outreach material from four of the scenario planning case studies.

 

And here is the paper itself for further reading. The full version (including appendices) can be found on the Ecology and Society site.

Update: Questionnaire on food security and biodiversity conservation

A month ago we launched our questionnaire on food security and biodiversity conservation here on this blog. We have received a lot of positive feedback and support for the questionnaire so far.  We are particularly happy that it has been completed for 143 landscapes from many parts of the world (see map). A big ‘Thank you’ to all of you who have contributed to it by filling the questionnaire or by helping us to distribute it!

 

Map of the number of responses per country that we got in the last four weeks. Ethiopia obviously stands out as we have a case study landscape there as well and we seem to be quite well connected to experts in the country.

Map of the number of responses per country that we got in the last four weeks. Ethiopia obviously stands out as we have a case study landscape there ourselves and we seem to be quite well connected to experts in the country.

For those who had planned to fill the questionnaire, but haven’t done so yet – there is still time. Also, if you have contacts in those parts of the world where our responses are a bit thin so far, please forward the questionnaire to those colleagues. The survey will be open until 31 January 2016.

Again, here are the details.

To fill the questionnaire go to the following page:
https://evasys.leuphana.de/evasys_02/online.php
and enter the password (“TAN/Losung”):
foodbiodiv

More information on the questionnaire can also be found here.