Poverty versus biodiversity loss, again

By Joern Fischer

Over at Conservation Bytes, there’s an interesting blog entry on the role of conservation in developing countries. Specifically, the entry points to a recent paper in Biotropica, which is currently freely available here.

The paper by Erik Meijaard and Douglas Sheil makes a really important point, suggesting that it is important to understand multiple sides of environmental problems, to avoid polarized debates. I couldn’t agree more, and many entries in our blog here reflect similar reasoning – including for example entries on broadening our beam of compassion or thinking about the trade-offs between conservation and poverty. We have also touched on the bottom line of all this: a need for transdisciplinary research that engages local people and other stakeholders; and we have addressed the importance of how a given conservation problem is framed.

Personally, I greatly welcome contributions like those by Erik Meijaard and Douglas Sheil: in an academic context, it’s more difficult and less rewarding, at this stage, to work on real-world problems rather than engage in polarized academic debates. But it’s only if we move beyond polarized debates that we will achieve real conservation progress.

Enjoy their paper!

Advertisements

One thought on “Poverty versus biodiversity loss, again

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s